[parisc-linux] itlb miss handler optimizations!

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:02:04AM +0200, Joel Soete wrote:
> btw is it for that reason (interlock) that in your patch we can read:
> [...]
>         cmpb,=        %r0,t0,itlb_miss_...
>         nop
> [...]
> I am alway asking why the 'nop'.

To fill the delayed branch slot (a silly idea, but ...)

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk