pa reload problem

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message <200012301905.OAA19130@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>you write:
  > Note that register 611 is dead at insn 1067.
Yes.


  > However, we still have REG_EQUIV
  > notes which implicitly use register 611 on insns 1091 and 1607 (not sure
  > why there isn't a note on 1627).
Err, no, that's not true.  There is no idea of an "implicit" use like
this.  

  > This leads to disaster at insn 1607
  > when the hard register assigned to 611 gets reused for other purposes
  > in the intervening code.
This indicates a reload bug to me.


  > Is the REG_DEAD note for register 611 in the right place?
Yes.
jeff