[parisc-linux-cvs] linux-2.5 varenet

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:26:19PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> I'm wondering if we are missing additional fdc/fic insns needed
> for machines using 4-way associative cache. I thought we needed
> 4 fdc's in a row to guarantee all 4 possible cachelines are clean.
> Can someone confirm/clarify?

I thought this as well till jsm corrected my misunderstanding.
That's only needed for the fdce insn, not the fdc.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.