[parisc-linux-cvs] linux-2.5 varenet

[Grant Grundler]

Thibaut Varene wrote:
> reverted patch in arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c since it broke too many things 
>   (cache flushing isn't yet working fine it seems)

I'm wondering if we are missing additional fdc/fic insns needed
for machines using 4-way associative cache. I thought we needed
4 fdc's in a row to guarantee all 4 possible cachelines are clean.
Can someone confirm/clarify?

thanks,
grant