[parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
Byron Stanoszek
bstanoszek at comtime.com
Fri Jun 1 13:17:03 MDT 2007
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:38:40AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> This also breaks Alpha (which uses 02000000 for O_DIRECT) and parisc
>> (which uses 02000000 for O_RSYNC). So you ether need to choose a
>> different value or define O_CLOEXEC for those two architectures.
>>
>
> That's easy enough to fix...
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle at parisc-linux.org>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-parisc/fcntl.h b/include/asm-parisc/fcntl.h
> index 317851f..4ca0fb0 100644
> --- a/include/asm-parisc/fcntl.h
> +++ b/include/asm-parisc/fcntl.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #define O_DSYNC 01000000 /* HPUX only */
> #define O_RSYNC 02000000 /* HPUX only */
> #define O_NOATIME 04000000
> +#define O_CLOEXEC 08000000 /* set close_on_exec */
>
> #define O_DIRECTORY 00010000 /* must be a directory */
> #define O_NOFOLLOW 00000200 /* don't follow links */
These are octal values, so you really want to use 010000000 instead of
08000000. :-)
While looking at that file further, I noticed these two flags share the same
value. I don't know DMAPI/XDSM, but could they potentially conflict?
#define O_NOATIME 04000000
#define O_INVISIBLE 04000000 /* invisible I/O, for DMAPI/XDSM */
Regards,
-Byron
--
Byron Stanoszek Ph: (330) 644-3059
Systems Programmer Fax: (330) 644-8110
Commercial Timesharing Inc. Email: byron at comtime.com
More information about the parisc-linux
mailing list