[parisc-linux] Does it lakes some cloberred r1 in

[Grant Grundler]

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:35:48AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> The intent of the errata seems to be to relax the alignment requirement
> for ldc[dw],co in cases where the spinlock is not being shared with a
> non-coherent I/O device.

AFAIK, only one non-coherent PA-RISC box has PA2.0 and parisc-linux
doesn't support it: T600.

(I'm assuming ",co" completer is PA2.0 only - please correct me if
that's wrong.)

grant