[parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH] linuxthreads for hppa (1/3)
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:36:57 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Ulrich,
>
>
>>- -# if __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT != 0
>>- - __pthread_handles[0].h_lock = __LOCK_INITIALIZER;
>>- - __pthread_handles[1].h_lock = __LOCK_INITIALIZER;
>>+# ifdef __LT_INITIALIZER_NOT_ZERO
>>+ __pthread_handles[0].h_lock = __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER;
>>+ __pthread_handles[1].h_lock = __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER;
>>
>>part is what I meant. There is no reason to change the name.
>
>
> How do you propose it be handled? All arches define __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT
I'm talking about this __LOCK_INITIALIZER -> __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER
change. Why do you claim the right to rename the symbol?
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/jYW52ijCOnn/RHQRAsmEAJ0cmMRxfMlyduuTG9TQMnATJVRJQQCgu/Vy
aL6qdcssSoUjY7D7oCnKXII=
=VzEk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----