[parisc-linux] FC driver?
Joel Soete
jsoe0708@tiscali.be
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:18:38 +0100
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for all those info.
Unfortunately I have no free time to help more on this driver (and also not
enough knowledge for the moment: even thought time and work could solve this
pb :) ).
Joel
>-- Original Message --
>To: Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@uswest.net>
>Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>,
> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
>Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] FC driver?
>From: grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com (Grant Grundler)
>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:38:04 -0700
>
>
>On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:22:23AM -0700, Ryan Bradetich wrote:
>> On parisc? I've had trouble with it running on my C200. Maybe
>> it is time to try it again. I know Jes and Martin worked on it
>> for i386..
>
>my bad - you are right. It still doesn' work. Details follow.
>
>I just tried it again with:
>20:00.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21154 (rev 02)
>21:04.0 Fibre Channel: Hewlett-Packard Company Tach TL Fibre Channel
>Host Adapter (rev 0a)
>21:05.0 Fibre Channel: Hewlett-Packard Company Tach TL Fibre Channel
>Host Adapter (rev 0a)
>
>20:00.0 Class 0604: 1011:0026 (rev 02)
>21:04.0 Class 0c04: 103c:1028 (rev 0a)
>21:05.0 Class 0c04: 103c:1028 (rev 0a)
>
>cpqfc driver loads but still finds no devices on the FC hub.
>
>gsyprf11:~# modprobe cpqfc
> scsi_register allocating 6640 bytes for FC HBA
> HBA found!
> HostAdapter->PciDev->irq = 256
> PciDev->baseaddress[0]= 0
> PciDev->baseaddress[1]= 20000
> PciDev->baseaddress[2]= 20100
> PciDev->baseaddress[3]= fffffffffa040000
> cpqfcHBAdata->fcChip.Registers. :
> IOBaseL = 20000
> IOBaseU = 20100
> ioremap'd Membase: fffffffffa040000
> SFQconsumerIndex.address = fffffffffa040058
> ERQproducerIndex.address = fffffffffa040008
> TYconfig.address = fffffffffa040184
> FMconfig.address = fffffffffa0401c0
> FMcontrol.address = fffffffffa0401c4
> Requesting 255 I/O addresses @ 20000
> Requesting 255 I/O addresses @ 20100
> ResetTachyon
> HBA Tachyon RevId 2.2
>Allocating 129024 for 576 Exchanges @ 00000000355e0000
>Allocating 112904 for LinkQ @ 00000000355c0000 (576 elements)
>Allocating 106504 for TachSEST for 512 Exchanges
> cpqfcTS: writing IMQ BASE 7580000h PI 7584000h
> cpqfcTS: SEST 000000004be80000(virt): Wrote base 75A0000h @
>fffffffffa040140
>cpqfcTS: NVRAM read failed
> WARNING! HBA NVRAM WWN read failed - make alias
> WWN 51044F1044556677
> Waiting for broken Brocade switch...
> scsi_register allocating 6640 bytes for FC HBA
> HBA found!
> HostAdapter->PciDev->irq = 257
> PciDev->baseaddress[0]= 0
> PciDev->baseaddress[1]= 20200
> PciDev->baseaddress[2]= 20300
> PciDev->baseaddress[3]= fffffffffa041000
> cpqfcHBAdata->fcChip.Registers. :
> IOBaseL = 20200
> IOBaseU = 20300
> ioremap'd Membase: fffffffffa041000
> SFQconsumerIndex.address = fffffffffa041058
> ERQproducerIndex.address = fffffffffa041008
> TYconfig.address = fffffffffa041184
> FMconfig.address = fffffffffa0411c0
> FMcontrol.address = fffffffffa0411c4
> Requesting 255 I/O addresses @ 20200
> Requesting 255 I/O addresses @ 20300
> ResetTachyon
> HBA Tachyon RevId 2.2
>Allocating 129024 for 576 Exchanges @ 000000004be60000
>Allocating 112904 for LinkQ @ 000000004be40000 (576 elements)
>Allocating 106504 for TachSEST for 512 Exchanges
> cpqfcTS: writing IMQ BASE 7800000h PI 7804000h
> cpqfcTS: SEST 000000004be20000(virt): Wrote base 7820000h @
>fffffffffa041140
>cpqfcTS: NVRAM read failed
> WARNING! HBA NVRAM WWN read failed - make alias
> WWN 510450E844556677
> Waiting for broken Brocade switch...
>scsi6 : Agilent FC HBA, Tachyon XL2 HPFC-5200B/2.2: WWN 51044F1044556677
> on PCI bus 33 device 0x1028 irq 256 IObaseL 0x20000, MEMBASE 0xfa040000
>PCI bus width 64 bits, bus speed 66 MHz
>FCP-SCSI Driver v2.1.1
>GBIC detected: Unknown. LPSM 0h Monitor
>scsi7 : Agilent FC HBA, Tachyon XL2 HPFC-5200B/2.2: WWN 510450E844556677
> on PCI bus 33 device 0x1028 irq 257 IObaseL 0x20200, MEMBASE 0xfa041000
>PCI bus width 64 bits, bus speed 66 MHz
>FCP-SCSI Driver v2.1.1
>GBIC detected: Short-wave. LPSM 0h Monitor
>gsyprf11:~#
>
>The "NVRAM read failed" msg seems to be a problem still.
>Fixing that would be a next step. The GBIC detection is the
>next problem that would need work. Looks like a timing problem
>since the first GBIC was not detected and the second one was.
>
>grant
>_______________________________________________
>parisc-linux mailing list
>parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
>http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
---------------------------------
Vous surfez avec une ligne classique ?
Economisez jusqu'à 25% avec Tiscali Complete !
Offre spéciale : première année d'abonnement offerte.
... Plus d'info sur http://complete.tiscali.be