[parisc-linux] The new PS/2 Keyboard Driver
Helge Deller
deller@gmx.de
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 01:45:52 +0100
On Friday 27 October 2000 01:50, Helge Deller wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2000 22:05, Thomas Marteau wrote:
>
> > >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > We've just updated the PS/2 keyboard driver. The leds and interrupt
> > functions work really well on a 712 workstation and also B132 now. The
> > updated driver files are available on our website. It works better than
> > under HP UX for the B 132 ;->
> >
> > http://www.esiee.fr/~djoudim
> >
> > The ESIEE Port Team in Paris.
> >
> > Here is the patch:
> >
> > diff -urN linux/drivers/char/gsc_ps2.c linux-parisc/drivers/char/gsc_ps2.c
> > --- linux/drivers/char/gsc_ps2.c Thu Oct 26 21:06:54 2000
> > +++ linux-parisc/drivers/char/gsc_ps2.c Thu Oct 26 21:34:00 2000
> > @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
> > [.............]
>
> > diff -urN linux/drivers/char/keyb_at.c linux-parisc/drivers/char/keyb_at.c
> > --- linux/drivers/char/keyb_at.c Thu Oct 26 21:07:00 2000
> > +++ linux-parisc/drivers/char/keyb_at.c Thu Oct 26 21:23:16 2000
> > [........]
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your patch.
> But I don't think it's a good idea to change a common file like keyb_at.c,
> which is used in most other arches too. This patch surely breaks their
> keyboard support and more than that I'm sure, that Linus will not accept
this
> patch, when the time is come to integrate parisc into the official kernel.
>
> Isn't there any other solution as for example to #ifdef the code or create
a
> new keyb_at.c for parisc (Yes I know, both of those aren't clean too.) ?
>
> Helge Deller
Hi folks,
I need to correct myself on this topic. The ESIEE-team made a great patch and
didn't changed any globally used file. keyb_at.c is just used in the current
parisc-port, and so it's ok to change that file.
I just committed their changes to the CVS, and in the same cycle tried to
clean up the code. In the same step I renamed the original filenames to some
hopefully better ones.
Since I don't own myself a real HP PS/2 keyboard (it's just an PC-AT one with
a small DIN to PS/2-connector), it would be great to get some feedback if I
did the Right Thing.
Helge.