[palinux-palo] bug#145: acknowledged by developer (fixed in palo-0.94)

X-PA-RISC Linux-PR-Message: report 145
X-PA-RISC Linux-PR-Package: palo
X-Loop: daniel_frazier@hp.com
Received: via spool by 145-bugs@bugs.parisc-linux.org id=B145.100470561517843
          (code B ref 145); Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:03:01 GMT
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:55:06 +0000
From: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
To: 145@bugs.parisc-linux.org
Cc: Paul Bame <bame@fc.hp.com>
Message-ID: <20011102125506.E5773@linuxcare.com>
References: <E15zSFC-0005o2-00@noam.fc.hp.com> <20010903143540.A11744@linuxcare.com> <handler.145.D145.10046610968698.notifdone@bugs.parisc-linux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us
In-Reply-To: <handler.145.D145.10046610968698.notifdone@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; from daniel_frazier@hp.com on Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 05:33:02PM -0700

Yes, it was fixed in 0.94, but taggart changed it back to arch hppa
mid October, because non-hppa archs were objecting to it being

Section: base
Priority: important

One possible solution is to build palo and palo-any debs, which
are identical except for the section/priority.

Alternatively make it some section/priority that is acceptable
to everyone, and rely on debootstrap pulling it in anyway during
install.

Leaving things as they are and expecting people to build it themselves
for non-hppa is a possibility, but I don't know whether Debian will
accept thatwhen they come to build official woody release CDs.

Richard

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 05:33:02PM -0700, PA-RISC Linux bug Tracking System wrote:
> X-PA-RISC Linux-PR-Message: they-closed 145
> 
> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
> #145: palo needed on non-pa systems for debian-cd,
> which was filed against the palo package.
> 
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
> Paul Bame <bame@fc.hp.com>.
> 
> Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact the developer directly, or email
> 145@bugs.parisc-linux.org or me.
> 
> dann frazier
> (administrator, PA-RISC Linux bugs database)
> 
> Received: (at 145-done) by bugs.parisc-linux.org; 2 Nov 2001 00:31:36 +0000
> >From bame@fc.hp.com  Thu Nov  1 17:31:36 2001
> Received: from atlrel6.hp.com (atlrel6.hp.com [192.151.27.8])
> 	by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE678482B
> 	for <145-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; Thu,  1 Nov 2001 17:31:35 -0700 (MST)
> Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.1.50.190])
> 	by atlrel6.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7471F578
> 	for <145-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; Thu,  1 Nov 2001 19:31:34 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from noam.fc.hp.com (noam.fc.hp.com [15.1.52.69])
> 	by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA22B437C
> 	for <145-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; Thu,  1 Nov 2001 17:31:34 -0700 (MST)
> Received: from bame by noam.fc.hp.com with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
> 	id 15zSFC-0005o2-00
> 	for <145-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2001 17:31:34 -0700
> To: 145-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org
> Subject: fixed in palo-0.94
> Message-Id: <E15zSFC-0005o2-00@noam.fc.hp.com>
> From: Paul Bame <bame@fc.hp.com>
> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 17:31:34 -0700
> 