[kernel] bug#69: marked as done (Dino/100BT: Use "Good Dog" Timer to limit GSC bus tenancy)

PA-RISC Linux bug Tracking System daniel_frazier@hp.com
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:33:02 -0700 (MST)


X-PA-RISC Linux-PR-Message: closed 69

Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:18:04 -0700
with message-id <200111162018.NAA26443@puffin.external.hp.com>
and subject line LATENCY_TIMER is correct
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

dann frazier
(administrator, PA-RISC Linux bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.parisc-linux.org; 7 Mar 2001 00:50:31 +0000
>From maswan@acc.umu.se  Tue Mar  6 17:50:31 2001
Received: from khan.acc.umu.se (khan.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.139])
	by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9154A4A19
	for <submit@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; Tue,  6 Mar 2001 17:50:30 -0700 (MST)
Received: from tiger.acc.umu.se (maswan@tiger.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.209])
	by khan.acc.umu.se (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f270oQS23591
	for <submit@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 01:50:26 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from maswan@localhost)
	by tiger.acc.umu.se (8.11.2/8.10.0) id f270oPn19104
	for submit@bugs.parisc-linux.org; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 01:50:25 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 01:50:23 +0100
From: Mattias Wadenstein <maswan@acc.umu.se>
To: submit@bugs.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Dino/100BT: Use "Good Dog" Timer to limit GSC bus tenancy
Message-ID: <20010307015022.A19099@tiger.acc.umu.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i

Package: kernel
Severity: wishlist

Dino/100BT: Use "Good Dog" Timer to limit GSC bus tenancy instead
of limiting tulip DMA burst length. (Volunteer?)
(JSM has tried this - it didn't work. GGG thinks it should.)

Submitting stuff from the outdated TODO List.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 69-done) by bugs.parisc-linux.org; 16 Nov 2001 20:22:12 +0000
>From grundler@puffin.external.hp.com  Fri Nov 16 13:22:12 2001
Received: from puffin.external.hp.com (puffin.external.hp.com [192.25.206.4])
	by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77408482C
	for <69-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:22:12 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from grundler@localhost)
	by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA26443
	for 69-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:18:04 -0700
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:18:04 -0700
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@puffin.external.hp.com>
Message-Id: <200111162018.NAA26443@puffin.external.hp.com>
To: 69-done@bugs.parisc-linux.org
Subject: LATENCY_TIMER is correct


LATENCY_TIMER is in fact the correct way to solve this problem.

grant